【禁闻】要选票，还是炸弹？

【禁闻】要选票，还是炸弹？

【新唐人2011年6月6日讯】最近，大陆多名「微博名人」相继宣布作为独立参选人，参
加基层人大代表选举。而同一时间，江西抚州农民钱明奇因为上访无门，制造了针对政
府部门的连环爆炸事件。评论人士认为，当局最好是用选票来拆除炸弹。但选票这条路
在中国大陆是否可行呢？下面请看报导。

中国知名评论人李承鹏日前发表博文写道，「有人问，为什么要参选人大代表。」他解
答说：「其实大家都是这个国家的股东，拥有十三亿分之一股权。」

在这之前，中共官方媒体《环球时报》发表社论宣称：「独立参选人中，最受互联网关
注的，是那些一直在学习西方反对派的人。他们在试图把中国求同存异的包容性文
化，推向对抗性文化。现有体制对这部分独立参选人的不适应几乎是必然的。」

对此李承鹏嘲讽说，其实没那么多人想对抗，人们只是为了更好的讨生活，《环球时报
》不要从早上起床放眼过去全是假想敌；「你基因中充满着对抗，必须找人来砸才有活
下去的勇气、才能证明地心引力，如此你不该叫圆球时报，该叫铅球时报。」

继李承鹏之后，另一位同样颇具影响力的独立参选人「五岳散人「」，也在个人博客中
批驳《环球时报》的社论文章，他认为，这根本就是试图从根本上断绝任何人独立参选
的可能性。

除了官媒高调批判独立参选人之外，上个月中旬的时候，江西新余市的刘萍、魏忠平、
李思华等独立候选人，在地方选举期间，就曾经受到警方拘禁或监视限制，使他们参选
受阻。

江西独立参选人李思华：「我去人大谘询选举日的问题，那么人大选举委员会的工作人
员就回答我：'不关你的事！不要你管！'有个人讲：'他们大概只听得懂钱明奇的声
音，听不懂别人的声音。'」

早些时候，江西抚州农民钱明奇因为强拆问题多年上访无门，最终制造了多人死伤的连
环爆炸案。

中国知名评论人笑蜀据此在微博上留言表示：「抚州爆炸的蘑菇云惊醒我们，赶紧争取
属于我们的选票。否则，听任绝望蔓延，就会有无数个钱明奇出现。炸弹不是捂盖子能
捂掉的，只能用选票拆除炸弹。」

大陆民间选举专家姚立法：「我们要结束、终结'枪杆子里面出政权'这种理论，这种暴
政的理论，以黑制黑、以暴制暴 这种理论，我们宣传的是'选票箱里出政权'。」

姚立法同时还分析了，在中国大陆，公民参选遇阻的深层原因。

姚立法：「真正按照个人的意志、按照法定的程序，行使他的选举权和被选举权的
话，他们感到是恐惧的，他们实质是恐惧的，他们是十分害怕。而且他们心里更明白的
是：真正民主的那一天，就是他们末日的来临。」

大陆资深媒体人章文在博文中谈到，「要选票，还是炸弹？这是摆在中国人面前越来越
迫切的两个选项，100年前的清政府也曾面临过，结果处置不当丧失政权。」

新唐人记者李静、李谦、周天采访报导。

Votes or Bombs?Recently, many Chinese "micro-blog celebrities"have
announced their run in local elections,as independent candidates. At the
same time,farmer Qian Mingqi in Fuzhou, Jiangxi Provincebombed several
local government departments,as he couldn't petition for his forced
demolition case.Commentators believe the best way for authoritiesto
dismantle a bomb is through elections.

Well-known critic Li Chengpeng wrote on his blog:"People ask me why I'm
running in this election.I respond, we are all shareholders in this
country.Each holds one of 1.3 billion shares."

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP)'s mediaGlobal Times editorial
declared:"Among independent candidates, netizens are mostconcerned about
people, who have been studyingWestern oppositions. They are trying to
turnChina's inclusive culture into a confrontational one."

Li refuted the argument. He said, not many peoplewant to oppose anyone.
They just want a better life.Global Times can only see imaginary
enemies.Li: "As Global Times faces much opposition,to survive, it needs to
attack people, thereforeit should change its name to 『Lead Shot Times.'"

Another equally influential independent candidate,Wuyue Sanren, refuted the
editorial in his blog.He said it was attempting to eliminate any
possibilityof independent candidates running for elections.

In mid May, in Xinyu City of Jiangxi Province,independent candidates Liu
Ping, Wei Zhongpingand Li Sihua had been detained and monitoredby police,
who impeded their election.

Jiangxi independent candidate Li Sihua: "I wentto People's Congress to ask
about the election,the staff responded: 'It is none of your business!'"A
netizen commented: "They probably understandonly Qian Mingqi's voice, not
the voice of others.

Farmer Qian Mingqi in Fuzhou, Jiangxi Provinceset off bombs that caused
many deaths.

Well-known commentator Xiao Shu micro-blogged,"We are awakening by mushroom
clouds.We need to quickly win the votes that belong to us.If the despair
spreads, numerous Qians will appear.Bombs can only be dismantled by votes."

Expert on civil elections Yao Lifa: "We want the endof (CCP') theory 'power
comes from military might.'This is a theory of violence and tyranny.We
advocate 'power comes from ballot boxes.'

Yao analyzed the underlying causesof independent candidates being impeded.

Yao: "Peoples' independent exercising of legal rightsof participating in
elections and being electedmakes the CCP fearful. The CCP truly
understandsthat when China becomes a democracy, it will die."

Chinese veteran media professional, Zhang Wen,wrote on his blog, "Votes or
bombs?These are the two options before the Chinese.100 years ago, the Qing
governmentfaced the same crisis. Their improperhandling of the issue cost
them the power."

NTD reporters Li Jing, Li Qian and Zhou Tian 2011-06-06
09:00:41http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/06/06/a542455.html.-【禁闻】要选
票，还是炸弹？.html